Community Notes, if used well, can become a crowdsourced solution to fake information
By ALEXANDRE GUERY
Global Business Journalism reporter
In a world where misinformation spreads rapidly, Community Notes offers a crowdsourced solution to fact-checking, empowering users to tackle disinformation in real time.
Here’s why this approach is the future of fighting fake news online.
What Are Community Notes?
Community Notes, a feature on X (formerly Twitter), lets users add factual corrections to misleading posts. Through a crowd-sourced voting system, users can flag questionable content, submit corrections, and help ensure that accurate information prevails.
How does it work?
Users can flag misleading posts for a Community Note, signaling that the post may need additional context or correction.
Eligible users submit factual corrections, which must be neutral and evidence-based to maintain credibility. These can change errors or add missing context.
Other users vote on the note’s accuracy, with the most helpful notes rising to the top for visibility through a voting system created for Community Notes.
Once a note gains enough votes, it’s displayed on the post, ensuring peer-reviewed corrections are accessible to all. This offers a chance for both visibility and a review for corrections and clarifications.
How to register for Community Notes
To participate, users must sign up through X’s Community Notes platform.
To join, your account must:
● Have no violations since January 2023
● Be at least six months old
● Have a verified phone number from a trusted carrier
Once registered, you can submit corrections, vote on notes, and track your contributions. Community Notes fosters collective responsibility, enabling users to maintain accuracy and transparency in online content.
A Community Notes case study: The Sydney Wilson incident
The Sydney Wilson case is a powerful example of how Community Notes can effectively combat disinformation. After Wilson allegedly stabbed an American cop, social media quickly became a breeding ground for false narratives.
Initial misinformation
Unverified posts misrepresented key details of the incident. Misinformation spread rapidly, with even Sydney Wilson’s former basketball team mourning "her tragic death," overlooking the fact that she had attacked and stabbed a cop. Many users unknowingly shared these inaccurate posts, further fueling confusion.
Community Notes in action
Users quickly corrected the narrative by flagging false claims through Community Notes. They added factual corrections based on the policeman’s body camera footage, which clearly showed the full interaction and clarified what actually happened. This swift intervention replaced speculation with verified information.
Impact on public perception
As verified information spread, misinformation gradually diminished. Community Notes played a key role in transforming public opinion, shifting it from emotional reactions to a more fact-based understanding. Many posts cited these updates, bringing much-needed clarity and helping the truth emerge.
Positive outcome
The Sydney Wilson case demonstrates how effective Community Notes is at slowing the spread of misinformation. By enabling users to fact-check content, it helped shift the discussion from speculation to informed understanding. Without it, false narratives could have misled more people and shaped opinions based on incorrect information.
Assessing the pros and cons of Community Notes
Benefits
√ Identifying fake accounts
Community Notes help identify and expose fake accounts that spread misinformation. By flagging suspicious activity and verifying content, they allow users to distinguish between trustworthy sources and malicious actors, reducing the spread of disinformation.
√ Providing studies and verified sources to clarify misinformation
A viral post claimed that Fenbendazole, an anti-parasitic drug used in veterinary medicine, had proven anti-cancer effects, citing 12 mechanisms in lab studies. Community Notes intervened, clarifying that while some preliminary research suggests potential anti-cancer properties in animal studies, there is no solid clinical evidence that it cures cancer in humans. The notes also pointed to multiple fact-checks and medical sources highlighting the lack of human trials and warning against spreading unproven cancer treatment claims.
√ Viral content drives accuracy
Managing the large volume of Community Notes while ensuring accuracy can be challenging, and some misinformation may still slip through the cracks.
However, one of the key benefits of Community Notes is that the more viral a piece of information becomes, the more likely it is to be reviewed by users.
As a post gains traction, more users contribute to fact-checking, increasing the likelihood that accurate information will be added.
In this way, the more viral a post is, the more attention it receives from the community, leading to more reviews and, ultimately, greater detail and accuracy in the corrections.
Challenges
√ Bias in crowdsourcing:
Popular opinions or biases can sometimes overshadow facts, leading to unrelated or harmful discussions. For example, rumors about Sydney Wilson being transgender, which were irrelevant to the case, surfaced and were later debunked by Community Notes.
Even after the correction, the post had been viewed more than 10.9 million times, showing the wide reach of both misinformation and its correction.
√ Potential for hatred
Misinformation or sensitive topics can fuel emotional or hateful responses, even when addressed by Community Notes. In the case of Sydney Wilson, a sarcastic and inflammatory post falsely claimed she was killed by a cop because of her race, gaining over 33 million views. Despite Community Notes providing context and debunking the claim, the post pushed a harmful narrative and sparked widespread outrage.
Even when framed as jokes or sarcasm, such posts can escalate emotions and fuel unnecessary hatred, regardless of any corrections.
√ Voting system delays:
Notes may sometimes struggle to gain enough votes or visibility, which can delay the correction of false information. For example, an AI-generated video has already reached an audience of 303,000 but after nine hours, the Community Note is still pending, highlighting how delays in the voting process can impact timely corrections.
Criticisms
√ Scalability concerns
Experts worry about whether Community Notes can keep up with the huge amount of content shared on big social media platforms. With millions of posts every day, it’s hard to make sure all misinformation gets reviewed and corrected quickly. As the platform grows, making the system handle so much content is a big challenge.
The study published in PNAS Nexus explores the effectiveness of community-based fact-checking on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). The study shows that people trust community notes more than simple misinformation warnings, especially when the notes explain why a post is misleading.
This crowdsourced fact-checking system helps address trust issues that often arise with traditional expert-led fact-checking. However, as social media platforms grow and AI-generated misinformation increases, managing misinformation effectively remains a challenge.
Analysis and conclusion: Why community notes are the future of fact-checking
Recent research has indicated that community-based fact-checking reduces the spread of misleading posts on social media. How?
√ Scalability and speed
Community Notes uses a large number of users to quickly spot and flag false information, making it faster than traditional fact-checking groups. Its crowd-powered system keeps up with the huge amount of social media posts in real time.
√ Democratizing fact-checking
Instead of relying only on experts, Community Notes allows everyday users to check facts, making the process more open and fair. This encourages more people to be involved in spotting fake news and boosts media awareness.
√ Increased trust through transparency
Community Notes shows the full process behind fact-checks, letting users understand why something was corrected. This openness builds trust and makes people more likely to accept the corrections.
√ Reducing the spread of misinformation
By attaching fact-checks directly to false posts, Community Notes stops fake information from spreading fast. This quick action reduces how many people engage with the misinformation before it goes viral.
√ Harnessing collective intelligence
Community Notes brings together a wide range of perspectives from users all over the world, helping reduce bias in fact-checking. This method, used successfully by platforms like Wikipedia, leads to better fact-check results.
In a world where misinformation is a growing problem, Community Notes offers an easy way for users to help keep online information accurate and transparent. By letting everyone join in fact-checking, it can provide a powerful and scalable answer to fake news. The more people who participate in it, the better it can become.
Your efforts can help create a more reliable and trustworthy online space. It is not a choice of Community Notes or professional fact-checkers. It is a choice of whether or not to build Community Notes into a force against false information.
Comments